Anonymous User
HP 1000/1000
AM 0
MP 0
#2965
>>2972
3 weeks ago
>>2873
buncha EPI'd faggots
↑ view thread
#2964 3 weeks ago
^
he needs DXM
↑ view thread
#2963 3 weeks ago
test
↑ view thread
#2961 3 weeks ago
You the faggot, MB
↑ view thread
#2959 3 weeks ago
^ just don't become glowmin 2.0 and lock this place down because of one or two individuals. taking away everyone's freedoms is what the bad actors want.
↑ view thread
#2958 3 weeks ago
test
↑ view thread
#2954 3 weeks ago
cool
↑ view thread
#2953 3 weeks ago
>>2952
I didn't, its enabled for high weight identities. 3 users here fit that bill. In another week, all the regulars will be able to use proxies.
↑ view thread
#2943 3 weeks ago
^ a fridge
↑ view thread
#2942 3 weeks ago
what did you eat!!!
↑ view thread
#2939 3 weeks ago
>>2938
almost done with the features, will be deployed soon.
↑ view thread
#2938
>>2939
3 weeks ago
>>2936
All you have to do is this. Ban Stevie, ban Brazil, ban everything but pure residential IPs.
↑ view thread
#2936
>>2938
3 weeks ago
>>2934
yeah, i got the same false positive for the ip you're talking about. i caught it though. well deploy some better code soon to prevent the fuck tards.
↑ view thread
#2935 3 weeks ago
>>2932
there would be no value and no opalescence without teasing you here and down there~
↑ view thread
#2934
>>2936
3 weeks ago edited
i don't think it's very sophisticated. i believe he just found an open-source list of IPs on github (he posted the link on feels) and checks if the poster's IP is in there. he also uses a third-party analysis tool, but he does it manually, when someone is being annoying, he checks and then adds the IP manually to the list. he claimed that my home IP was 99.99999% certainty a residential VPN and i told him that it's bullshit. the service could guesstimating based on a list of factors, but it doesn't make it transparent so it's not trustworthy in my opinion.
↑ view thread